Legal Opinion

L. D. Garrett Co. v. Morton

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1901PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Demurrer to complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtLeventritt, J.

This case differs from that of L. D. Garrett v. McComb, N. Y. L. J., Nov. 30, 1900, only in the particular that there the complaint was dismissed at the end of the plaintiff’s case, while here judgment for the defendant is sought on demurrer to a complaint identical with that in the earlier suit. Garrett v. McComb was dismissed on two grounds. (1) The illegality of the agreement of which the purchase and sale of stock *11was a part, and (2) failure to prove agency bn the part of those whom the plaintiff claimed represented the defendant. On appeal the judgment was affirmed on the latter ground…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. . BallardNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Bath Gas Light Co. v. . ClaffyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Verplanck v. Mercantile InsuranceNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  4. Brook'n Steam Transit Co. v. . City of Brook'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Skinner v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rohr v. Stanton Trust & Savings BankMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Assets Realization Co. v. HowardNew York Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Assets Realization Co. v. HowardNew York Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Craddock-Terry Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
  5. Assets Realization Co. v. HowardNew York Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API