Legal Opinion

Rohr v. Stanton Trust & Savings Bank

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1926No. 5,897PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Galen

In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendant the sum of $1,191.72, together with interest from July 9, 1923, and costs of suit. In his complaint it is alleged: “That at all of the times hereinafter mentioned the defendant was, and still is, a corporation, duly created, organized, and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Montana, and that during the year of 1923, up to on or about the 9th day of July, 1923, the defendant was engaged in a general deposit and banking business, with its principal place of business at Great Falls, Montana, and that on or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. L. D. Garrett Co. v. MortonNew York Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Merchants' National Bank v. National BankDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1916
  3. Stebbins v. SavageMontana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Gardner v. CaldwellMontana Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Gilna v. BarkerMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Guild v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930
  4. Wilcox v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
  5. Craddock-Terry Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API