Margiotti Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Horace Stern,
We assume — as fairly we must in the absence of evidence to the contrary — that neither the District Attorney of Allegheny County nor the Attorney General of the Commonwealth has been guilty of any improper motivations in the performance of their respective official duties in connection with the events giving rise to the present controversy. The question for this Court to determine is whether statements of the District Attorney, his actions, failure to act, delays in action, or conduct in general, however free from any purposeful wrongdoing, justified the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McNair's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Minerd v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Dauphin County Grand Jury Investigation ProceedingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Dauphin County Grand Jury Investigation ProceedingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Philadelphia County Grand Jury Investigation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
3Cited by46 opinions
- Matson v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- State of Florida Ex Rel. Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General, Plaintiff v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Commonwealth ex rel. Specter v. FreedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Margiotti v. OrsiniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Commonwealth v. SchabSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.