Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Schwartz & American Swim Pools

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 25, 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding to stay arbitration, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 17, 1979, which denied the application. Judgment reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and application to stay arbitration granted. Cases involving public policy considerations which are "embodied in statute or decisional law” and which "prohibit, in an absolute sense,” the granting of the relief sought, should not proceed to arbitration for the resolution of the issues (Matter of Sprinzen [Nomberg], 46 NY2d 623, 631). Section 21-11.2 of the Nassau County…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Sprinzen & NombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Segrete v. ZimmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Buffoleno v. DenningCivil Court of the City of New York · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Millington v. RapoportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. In re the Arbitration between Wertlieb & Greystone Partnerships Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Metrobuild Associates, Inc. v. NahoumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Al-Sullami v. BroskieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Dartmouth Plan, Inc. v. ValleNew York Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API