Legal Opinion
Buffoleno v. Denning
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided May 27, 1975PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTheodore Alexander Bardy, J.
The defendants move to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint containing two causes of action on the ground that the plaintiff was an unlicensed contractor.
The court has read the papers submitted by counsel for the respective parties and the cases cited therein. (See, also, Galbreath — Ruffin Corp. v 40th & 3rd Corp., 19 NY2d 354; Richards Conditioning Corp. v Oleet, 21 NY2d 895; Griffin v Cafarelli, 38 AD2d 847; Wineman v Blueprint 100, 75 Misc 2d 665; East Coast Moving & Stor. v Flappin, 78 Misc 2d 140; Assos Home Improvement v Terrebetzky Civ Ct, Queens County, Index No. 40017/1974, April 9,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Galbreath-Ruffin Corp. v. 40th & 3rd Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Richards Conditioning Corp. v. OleetNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Wineman v. Blueprint 100, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1973
- East Coast Moving & Storage, Inc. v. FlappinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1974
- Griffin v. CafarelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ellis v. GoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Anton Sattler, Inc. v. CummingsNew York Supreme Court · 1980
- In re the Arbitration between Schwartz & American Swim PoolsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Dartmouth Plan, Inc. v. ValleNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- Gargano v. SmithCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.