Guenther v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

This appeal questions whether summary judgment was inappropriate because genuine issues of material fact remain on appellant’s claims for various no-fault insurance benefits. We affirm on the issue of replacement expenses for household services but reverse on the issues of income loss and occupational training and rehabilitation benefits.

FACTS

Appellant Lori Guenther was severely injured in an automobile-train accident in September 1984. Guenther lives with her parents and is a beneficiary under their no-fault insurance policy with respondent Austin Mutual Insurance…