Carroll v. M. & J. Finance Corp.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Oxner, Justice.
The complaint in this case contained three causes of action but in view of the rulings of the Court below, we are not called upon to construe them. As to defendant Blue Ridge Insurance Company, the trial Judge held that it was liable to plaintiff on a policy insuring her against loss or damage to her automobile from collision or upset and instructed the jury to find its value at the time of the collision. The case was submitted to the jury against the defendant M & J Finance Corporation solely upon a cause of action for conversion. The jury found the value of the automobile at…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Neel v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Richstein v. RoeschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- Brandenburg v. Northwestern Jobbers Credit BureauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Kunze v. CoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Commercial Credit Co. v. CookSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
3Cited by1 opinion
- Branham v. PrewittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982