Legal Opinion
Reynolds and Reynolds Co. v. Tart
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided February 12, 1997No. Civil 5:96CV77-TPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THORNBURG, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendants’ timely filed objections to a November 27, 1996, Memorandum and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr., denying the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. 1 Having reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation, as well as the motions and pleadings of the parties, this Court will adopt the recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge in full.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
The Court reviews de novo those portions of the Memorandum and Recommendation to which objections have been…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Traffic Control Services, Inc. v. United Rentals Northwest, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Hejl v. Hood, Hargett & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Philips Electronics North America Corp. v. HopeDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2009
- Better Bus. Forms & Prods., Inc. v. CraverNorth Carolina Business Court · 2007
- M.M., a minor, by and through her parent and next friend Martina Menn v. Daniel Marc LofaroDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.