Legal Opinion
Philips Electronics North America Corp. v. Hope
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided June 30, 2009No. 1:09cv00363PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge.
Before the court is the motion of Plaintiff Philips Electronics North America Corporation (“Philips”) to preliminarily enjoin its former employee, Defendant Jason Hope (“Hope”), from competing with it and from using or disclosing alleged confidential and proprietary information, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a). (Doc. 7.) After notice and a hearing, the court granted motions for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and expedited discovery. (Doc. 21.) Post-discovery briefing was filed…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Blackwelder Furniture Company of Statesville, Inc. v. Seilig Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Direx Israel, Ltd. Direx, Incorporated v. Breakthrough Medical Corporation Zvi Porath Avner SpectorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- United Laboratories, Inc. v. KuykendallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- In re Microsoft Corporation Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Hoechst Diafoil Company v. Nan Ya Plastics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Monster Energy Co. v. WenshengDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings v. KearnsDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
- Spirax Sarco, Inc. v. SSI Engineering, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
- ATI Industrial Automation, Inc. v. Applied Robotics, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
- S. Fastening Sys., Inc. v. Grabber Constr. Products, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.