Legal Opinion

Nunnally Co. v. Bromberg & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 12, 1928No. 6 Div. 776PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This action is by appellee against the appellant, and on the trial the plaintiff prevailed. The case was presented, on the merits, under the complaint as amended, consisting of five counts, the first being one of the common counts for' money due on account, and the others for breach of contract, and defendant’s plea of the general issue. The defendant filed a number of special pleas to which demurrers were sustained.

The assignments of error, of which there are two hundred and seventy-four, are predicated on the rulings of the court on the demurrers to 'the complaint, the demurrers to the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Stewart v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Austin v. BeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  3. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Prestwood v. CarltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Woodward Iron Co. v. MarbutSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Simmons v. CochranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  2. Coastal States Life Insurance Company v. GassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Ex Parte HolzerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Staples v. PearsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Winslett v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API