Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Cochran

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 23, 1949No. 7 Div. 993PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWSON, Justice.

Action by1- Mary Cochran and others, against W. P. Simmons for trespass to- realty, trespass to personalty, and for the .•statutory penalty for cutting trees.

There are fifteen assignments of error. Appellees strenuously insist that -appellant’s brief should be stricken and the judgment of the trial court affirmed 'because of the failure of the appellant to file in this court a brief in compliance with Supreme Court Rules 10 and 12, Code 1940, Tit. 7, Appendix, which prescribe the form and manner of the preparation of briefs by appellants. It is true that the brief filed on…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Burns v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Birmingham Railway & Electric Co. v. BowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Parker v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. White v. YawkeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Birmingham Mineral Railroad v. Tennessee Coal, Iron RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Adams v. Queen Insurance Company of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. Hall v. Dexter Gas CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  3. Bolton v. Barnett Lumber & Supply CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. Quinn v. HannonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Shelby County v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API