Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Sherwood

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 1978No. Civ. 52292PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

This is an action to collect business taxes which the plaintiff, the City of Los Angeles (City), contends are owed it by the defendants. After a nonjury trial, judgment was entered for the defendants, and the City appeals.

Defendants are three medical doctors who formed a corporation called Vendunn Company (Vendunn). In 1951, Vendunn purchased land and constructed a medical building. The defendants set up their individual practices in this building and leased office space to other doctors. It was defendants’ intention that the building would house most every medical…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marsh & McLennan of California, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. City of Los Angeles v. Meyers Brothers Parking System, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Rexall Drug Co. v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Independent Casting-Television, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Violette v. ShoupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. McCollum v. Friendly Hills Travel CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Programming-Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API