Rexall Drug Co. v. Peterson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.
Rexall Drug Company, a corporation, owns all of the stock of 10 subsidiary corporations. These subsidiary corporations engage principally in the manufacture and sale of articles commonly sold by drugstores.
Rexall administers the whole business enterprise, maintains a head office in Los Angeles, and furnishes accounting, financial, personnel, legal, executive managerial, and directive services to its subsidiaries. For these services Rexall charges each subsidiary its proportionate cost thereof. No profit is charged.
The city of Los Angeles claimed that these charges were subject to business…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Northwestern Pacific Railroad v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
3Cited by21 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. Rancho Homes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Inn Operations, Inc. v. River Hills Motor Inn Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Central Cooling & Supply Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- City of Los Angeles v. Clinton Merchandising Corp.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Kaufman v. ByersOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.