Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 18, 1990No. 72746Published

1Opinion of the Court

800 S.W.2d 739 (1990)

Robert A. WILLIAMS, Movant-Appellant,

v.

STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 72746.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

December 18, 1990.

Janet M. Thompson, Craig Johnston, Columbia, for movant-appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Andrea K. Spillars, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

BLACKMAR, Chief Justice.

The defendant pleaded guilty to four charges, two of rape and two of forcible sodomy. The trial judge advised him as follows:

THE COURT: Do you understand that under the law any Court is compelled to run…

Also in this document: Dissent · Rendlen; Dissent · Rendlen.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. ToneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. State v. BurgessSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  5. Adams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API