Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 18, 1990No. 72746PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKMAR, Chief Justice.

The defendant pleaded guilty to four charges, two of rape and two of forcible sodomy. The trial judge advised him as follows:

THE COURT: Do you understand that under the law any Court is compelled to run sentences consecutively in these cases?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir.

THE COURT: Do you understand that?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir.

*740THE COURT: And it is not within the privilege of any Court to run the sentences concurrently?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir.

THE COURT: Do you understand that the minimum sentence in each of these cases is ten years? Am I correct in that?

MR. FERRELL: That’s…

2Cited by30 opinions

  1. Steven L. Toney v. James A. Gammon Jeremiah (Jay) W. NixonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  2. State v. BurgessSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  3. Cherco v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Pettis v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API