Legal Opinion
Cohen v. Durning
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 16, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULBERT, District Judge.; The motion is for an injunction pendente lite.
Plaintiffs are jobbers engaged in the purchase and sale of cotton piece goods, much of which is imported. 650 bales, constituting some 19 shipments, at a total invoice cost of $79,030 are being held by the collector of customs of the port of New York in bonded warehouses for the payment of a compensating tax amounting to $9,127.38 in addition to the customs duties. Several other shipments are in transit.
The tax in question is levied pursuant to the Agricultural Adjustment Act of May 12,. 1933 (c. 25, 48 Stat. 31, 40, as…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hill v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Dows v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Union Packing Co. v. RoganDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1937
- Los Angeles Soap Co. v. RoganDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936
- Henrietta Mills v. HoeyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935
- Merkel, Inc. v. RasquinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1935