Legal Opinion · Dissent

Holt v. Childers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 16, 1946No. 32503Published

1DissentRiley, J.

The legislative attempt at appropriation, House Bill 518, 20th Oklahoma Legislature, 74 S.L. 1945, ch. 1, p. 376, should be cured of its obvious infirmities.

Pending prior litigation involving the lump sum purported and adjudged to be appropriated, the Governor made eleven allocations from the fund. They were stricken down, Wells v. Childers, 196 Okla. 353, 165 P. 2d 371, as being unconstitutional. By a bare majority of the Supreme Court the lump sum appropriation had been sustained. Wells v. Childers, 196 Okla. 339, 165 P. 2d 358.

The court is now confronted with a claim filed by Norman C.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shaw v. GrumbineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. In Re County Com'rs of Counties Comprising Seventh Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. State Ex Rel. Hudson v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Wells v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. State Ex Rel. Murray v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API