Legal Opinion
Sorenson Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 18, 2011No. 10-9536, 10-9560PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Sorenson Communications, Inc. challenges the 2010-2011 rates set by the Federal Communication Commission (“FCC” or “Commission”) to compensate Video Relay Service providers, including Sorenson. We deny the petition for review because the Commission’s order is consistent with its statutory mandate and is not arbitrary or capricious.
I
Title TV of the Americans with Disabilities Act mandates that individuals with hearing and speech disabilities have access to telecommunications relay services (“TRS”). See 47 U.S.C. § 225. TRS enables these individuals to access a telephone…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Rural Cellular Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Laura Beeman and Janet Lock v. Brad Livingston, in His Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Texas Department of Criminal JusticeTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Sorenson Commc'ns, LLC v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Lucero v. Sandia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Parker v. United AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Qwest Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.