Legal Opinion
Sorenson Commc'ns, LLC v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 24, 2018No. 17-1198; C/w 17-1202PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Griffith, Circuit Judge:
Video Relay Service (VRS) enables people with hearing or speech impairments to *218 communicate with people who use standard telephones. The VRS user communicates in sign language with an interpreter through a video connection, and the interpreter speaks with the hearing person using a standard phone. VRS is provided by several private companies who are reimbursed through rates set by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Two parties bring different challenges to the rates set by the FCC in 2017: Sorenson Communications, LLC ("Sorenson"), the largest VRS provider,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Viasat, Inc. v. FCCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- BLACK VOTERS MATTER FUND, INC. v. KEMP, GOVERNOR (Five Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2022
- Genus Medical Technologies LLC v. FDACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC v. SECCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of HarvardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.