Legal Opinion

Sheldon v. Vermonty

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 30, 1998No. 98-2277-JWLPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint (doc. 8). Specifically, defendants move to dismiss plaintiffs complaint for failure to comply with the pleading requirements of rules 8(a) and 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Additionally, defendants move to dismiss for improper venue, or in the alternative, for a venue transfer to the Eastern District of New York. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion is granted in part, and denied in part.

I. Factual Background

Plaintiff Dave Sheldon…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lillard v. StocktonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2003
  2. Coates v. Heartland Wireless Communications, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1999
  3. Precision Vascular Systems, Inc. v. Sarcos L.C.District Court, D. Utah · 2002
  4. Indy Lube Investments, L.L.C. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  5. Sheldon v. VermontyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API