Legal Opinion

American Bell Tel. Co. v. Cushman

U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois

Decided September 6, 1893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Equity. Suits for the infringement of letters patent No. 186,787, issued January 30, 1877, to Alexander Graham Bell, for a telephone. Motion for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

JENKINS, Circuit Judge.

The patent involved in these suits has passed under the review of the supreme court of the United States, Telephone Cases, 43 O. G. 377. 126 U. S. 1, 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 778,) and its validity sustained. The history of the Bell telephone patents is the history of an enormous litigation, involving the truth of alleged anticipations sought, to be sustained by a marvelous mass of evidence. The invention was attacked as perhaps no other invention was ever before attacked. It was sustained, and its integrity established by tlie decision of the highest and the ultimate judicial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Dolbear v. American Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1888

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Appert v. Brownsville Plate Glass Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Schmertz Wire-Glass Co. v. Pittsburgh Plate-Glass Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Edison Electric Light Co. v. Waring Electric Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1894
  4. Merrell-Soule Co. v. Powdered Milk Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
  5. Ullman v. ThompsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API