United States v. Frank Victor Scaramuzzo, AKA Frank Moore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BROWNING, DUNIWAY, and INGRAHAM, * Circuit Judges.
2Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of devising a scheme to defraud the Central Telephone Company in Las Vegas, Nevada, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. The evidence established that appellant avoided toll charges for at least one long distance call from Las Vegas to" Los Angeles by first placing a toll-free call to an area code 800 number subscribed to by the American Express Company in Phoenix, Arizona, and then diverting that call to the Los Angeles number by use of an electronic device called a “blue box.”
There is no merit in…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Herman D. Brandon v. United States of America, Sylvester E. Gautreaux, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Julius Frederick Spindler, Frank J. Richards, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- John L. Battaglia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Charles Dee Scott, Doyle Monroe Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
4Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Melvin L. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Irving S. Wise T/n Irving Stewart Wise, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Judith Reinsdorf DouglasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975