Legal Opinion

United States v. Judith Reinsdorf Douglas

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 27, 1975No. 74--2498PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ELY, Circuit Judge:

Douglas was convicted of having committed fraud by the use of a telephone in interstate commerce, an alleged violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. The trial was conducted by the district judge, upon stipulated facts and without jury.

Douglas was a subscriber to the services of the Central Telephone Company of Las Vegas, Nevada and, as such, was provided by the company with a telephone and an assigned number. Her fraudulent scheme involved the use of a mechanical device, commonly called a “blue box” in telephone parlance. The device, when attached to a subscriber’s system,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Alvin Bubis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  2. United States v. Frank Victor Scaramuzzo, AKA Frank MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Carol Ann Goldstein, United States of America v. Toby RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Melvin L. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Raymond AulerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API