Legal Opinion
Julius Frederick Spindler, Frank J. Richards, Etc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 13, 1964No. 19114PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLIN, Circuit Judge.
Julius F. Spindler and Frank J. Richards, appellants herein, and one Charles Rhodes (who did not appeal) were each convicted of fifteen counts of the violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (1958) (fraud by interstate wire) by a jury in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Jurisdiction is conferred on this court by 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1958).
The facts as shown by the record as to the various counts of the indictment are complicated. It was the theory of the prosecution that the guilt of the defendants below was established to the required degree…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Paul John Carbo, Frank Palermo, Joseph Sica, Louis Tom Dragna, and Truman K. Gibson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Holder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Benjamin Dranow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Carl D. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
- Marder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FreemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- United States v. John F. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Jose Luis Oropeza and Mark James MintonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. J. Norman JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Jack Lesley MarsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.