Legal Opinion

O'Bara v. Piekos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 11, 1990PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff was injured in a work-related accident while operating a chain *1119saw. The accident occurred when the saw kicked back and the blade of the saw cut plaintiffs leg. The saw was purchased by third-party defendant, Andre Tessier, doing business as Andy’s Tree and Shrub Service, plaintiffs employer, from the defendants Tadeusz Piekos and Vicki Piekos, doing business as Outdoor Equipment Sales, the franchise dealer of the saw. The saws were manufactured and sold to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Robinson v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Heller v. U. S. Suzuki Motor Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Lopez v. Precision Papers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. William Iselin & Co. v. LandauNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Colon Ex Rel. Molina v. Bic USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  2. Van Buskirk v. MigliorelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Smith v. Royce W. Day Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Smith v. Minster Machine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Automobile Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Murray, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API