Smith v. Minster Machine Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action against defendant, Minster Machine Company (Minster), the manufacturer of a power-press, for personal injuries she sustained while operating the press at her work place. When the press was purchased by the original buyer, it was equipped with a standard two-hand control system, designed to engage both hands of the operator while the press was being cycled. The only warning placed on the machine pertained to lubrication instructions and press…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Robinson v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Lamey v. FoleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Cooley v. Carter-Wallace Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Frederick v. Niagara Machine & Tool WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gian v. Cincinnati Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Repka v. Arctic Cat, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Ganter v. Makita U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Hoang v. ICM Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Schneider v. Verson Allsteel Press Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.