Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Clark v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1932No. 23600. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

An alternative writ of review was granted in this case directed to the trial judge of the lower court, returnable on a certain day, and on the return day a qualified order of review was granted, continuing in force the alternative writ until a day set, without prejudice to any and all defenses that might be interposed by respondent. A motion to quash had been made, and was renewed on the hearing of the matter on the day set therefor, and is still pending.

From the record before us, it appears that, on November 7, 1931, relator filed in the superior court a good and sufficient complaint under…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Neal v. KauffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State ex rel. Jakubowski v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State ex rel. Southern Alaska Canning Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State v. PearlWashington Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pierce v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Vance v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  3. Coupeville School District No. 204 v. VivianCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  4. City of Seattle v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Barry v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API