Legal Opinion

State v. Pearl

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1931No. 23029. En BancPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

In this, and eighteen other like cases, upon motion of the defendant in each cause upon verdicts of acquittal, judgments were entered discharging the defendants and allowing each a statutory attorney’s fee of fifteen dollars. The judgment in each case was that the defendant be discharged, and that he recover of and from the state of Washington judgment for costs, to-wit the statutory fee of fifteen dollars. The state appealed from each of those judgments. Respondents have each moved to dismiss the several appeals.

After the filing of the motions to dismiss, the proser cuting attorney filed in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Maglori v. SimanIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Doty v. KrutzWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Eggerth v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. State v. MurreyWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Eisen v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. MacRi v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State v. KeeneyWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State Ex Rel. Clark v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Bostwick v. Washington Motor Coach Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. King County v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API