Legal Opinion

Apostle v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1966No. 38343PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J. —

More than a score of plaintiffs, all owning property in that portion of Seattle just north of Lake Union and west of the University of Washington (bounded on the north by East 40th Street, on the east by University Way N.E., on the south by N.E. Boat Street, and on the west by the University Bridge) known as the proposed “University Addition-Northlake Urban Renewal Project,” commenced this action to enjoin the taking of their property by eminent domain proceedings, which the City of Seattle admits it intends to institute under the so-called Urban Renewal Law, RCW chapter 35.81.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Crommett v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
  4. Despatchers' Cafe Inc. v. Somerville Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  5. State Ex Rel. Tacoma School District No. 10 v. StojackWashington Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. W. & G. Co. v. Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  2. Edwards v. City Council of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  3. City of Phoenix v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Apostle v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. HutchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API