Apostle v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, J. —
More than a score of plaintiffs, all owning property in that portion of Seattle just north of Lake Union and west of the University of Washington (bounded on the north by East 40th Street, on the east by University Way N.E., on the south by N.E. Boat Street, and on the west by the University Bridge) known as the proposed “University Addition-Northlake Urban Renewal Project,” commenced this action to enjoin the taking of their property by eminent domain proceedings, which the City of Seattle admits it intends to institute under the so-called Urban Renewal Law, RCW chapter 35.81.
The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Crommett v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
- Despatchers' Cafe Inc. v. Somerville Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- State Ex Rel. Tacoma School District No. 10 v. StojackWashington Supreme Court · 1958
3Cited by14 opinions
- W. & G. Co. v. Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- Edwards v. City Council of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- City of Phoenix v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Apostle v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. HutchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.