Legal Opinion

Township of Pinconning v. Detroit & MacKinac Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1927No. Docket No. 25PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

The township of Pinconning was using gravel during the month of July, 1924, and had two cars shipped to it at Pinconning over defendant’s railroad. There is testimony tending to show that it had two cars shipped every other day. The gravel was shipped in gondola cars and they were placed on a team track where they were unloaded into trucks and a wagon. One Henry Rock was in the employ of the township in the work of unloading. On the afternoon’of July 11th, one of the cars had been unloaded and the workmen were in the other cax. They had filled the trucks and wagon and were waiting for their…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dolson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Davis v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Smith v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Lehman v. Eureka Iron & Steel WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Fitzpatrick v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API