Smith v. Pere Marquette Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Montcalm; Davis, J. Case by George Smith against the Pere Marquette Railroad Company for personal injuries. Prom a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad depot at Howard City is situated midway between Cass street, on the west, and Ensley street, on the east, and Williams street, on the north, and Shaw street, on the south. The main line ran nearly north and south at this point, passing the depot on the west side. A side track left the east side of the main track of the Grand Rapids & Indiana south of Shaw street, and passed the depot on the *225east side, and a short distance southeast of the depot was connected by switch with the main track of the Pere Marquette, thus making a transfer track between the two…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ryan v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Palmer v. Detroit, Lansing & Lake Michigan RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schofield v. GoldArizona Supreme Court · 1924
- Amedeo v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Burt v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Line v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Rollins v. Business Men's Accident Ass'n of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.