Legal Opinion

Smith v. Western Pacific Railroad

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 3, 1940No. Civ. No. 10949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants to recover damages for injuries sustained when he fell or was thrown from a freight car. After a trial before the trial court sitting with a jury, the latter returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Prom that judgment the defendants have appealed.

At San Jose the defendants maintain a freight yard. It is in the form of a crescent. The portion of the freight yard involved in the ease at bar extends in a general direction from north to south. On the wesiern side a spur track has been inserted which serves certain industries, among…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Seller v. Market-Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Stoutimore v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  4. Hamakawa v. Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Chadderdon v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Newman v. Fox West Coast TheatresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Miller v. Desilu Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Elliott v. LeeIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Smith v. American Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API