Smith v. Western Pacific Railroad
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants to recover damages for injuries sustained when he fell or was thrown from a freight car. After a trial before the trial court sitting with a jury, the latter returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Prom that judgment the defendants have appealed.
At San Jose the defendants maintain a freight yard. It is in the form of a crescent. The portion of the freight yard involved in the ease at bar extends in a general direction from north to south. On the wesiern side a spur track has been inserted which serves certain industries, among…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Seller v. Market-Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Stoutimore v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Hamakawa v. Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Chadderdon v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Newman v. Fox West Coast TheatresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Miller v. Desilu Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Elliott v. LeeIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
- Smith v. American Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957