Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Pittsburgh-Florida Fruit Growers Ass'n

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 1925No. Appeal, 43PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

Defendant was the owner of a tract of land in the State of Florida containing 610 acres, suitable for the raising of citrous fruits. The fourteen plaintiffs are purchasers from it of lots of five acres each under a contract with defendant obliging it to plant the lots in citrous fruits, to take care of them for a certain number of years and after six years from the date of planting to market the crops. Defendant was to be compensated during the years that it marketed the crops by a commission of ten per cent on the gross sales; the balance after the deduction of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tate-Jones & Co. v. Union Electric Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. White v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
  3. Wier v. American Locomotive Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Hook v. WelchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Coates v. CotteralSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Laney Et Ux. v. Columbia Nat. Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Rathblott v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Johnson v. RitterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of New York v. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API