Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Ritter

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1933No. Appeal 334PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Pabkeb, J.,

The plaintiff, a real estate agent, brought this action in assumpsit against the defendant to recover commissions alleged to be due plaintiff on a written contract appointing him agent for the sale of a lot owned by defendant. The issue is a narrow one and involves the proper measure of damages. The facts are not in dispute as the pleadings alone were depended upon to establish the facts. The trial court gave binding instructions and a verdict having been rendered for the defendant, plaintiff appealed.

The written agreement gave the plaintiff the exclusive right to sell…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Turner v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Wilson v. FranklinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. S. V. Thompson Co. v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Schnee v. Elston Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Duncan v. Pittsburgh-Florida Fruit Growers Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. National Bank of Kentucky v. MinaryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  2. Welsh's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1947
  3. Aiman v. Lukens, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1967
  4. Prosak v. Motts, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1955
  5. Quille v. Wible, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fulton County1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API