Legal Opinion
(PC) Madrid v. Anglea
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 7, 2020No. 1:19-cv-01456Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALEJANDRO MADRID, Case No. 1:19-cv-01456-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 13 v. OR NOTIFY THE COURT OF HIS DESIRE TO PROCEED ONLY ON 14 H. ANGLEA, et al., CLAIM FOUND COGNIZABLE 15 Defendants. (Doc. 1) 16 21-DAY DEADLINE 17 18 Alejandro Madrid challenges the defendants’ refusal to allow visitation with his wife. 19 (Doc. 1.) The Court finds that Plaintiff states a cognizable claim against H. Anglea but not Khan, 20 J. Toubeaux, or M. Voong. The Court further…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.