Legal Opinion

Blunt v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 2008No. 04-CF-1409PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRELL, Associate Judge, Retired:

Appellant (hereafter Blunt) was found guilty by a jury of armed voluntary manslaughter and possession of a prohibited weapon, both arising from the death of Robert Ford. On appeal, Blunt first argues that the trial judge erroneously allowed a prosecution witness to explain that she was afraid to testify because she had been “stabbed nine times and almost lost my life by testifying” — inferentially to the grand jury in this case — when no evidence linked Blunt to the stabbings. The judge immediately told the jury that there was “no evidence that Mr. Blunt…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Woodall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. Blackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Diggs v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Melendez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Blackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API