Blunt v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge, Retired:
Appellant (hereafter Blunt) was found guilty by a jury of armed voluntary manslaughter and possession of a prohibited weapon, both arising from the death of Robert Ford. On appeal, Blunt first argues that the trial judge erroneously allowed a prosecution witness to explain that she was afraid to testify because she had been “stabbed nine times and almost lost my life by testifying” — inferentially to the grand jury in this case — when no evidence linked Blunt to the stabbings. The judge immediately told the jury that there was “no evidence that Mr. Blunt…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Woodall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Blackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Diggs v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Melendez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Blackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.