Legal Opinion

Webster v. Gray

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1877PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Oceana. Bill fob. Specific Performance. The essential facts are in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This bill is filed to obtain the specific performance of a parol contract made in 1866, whereby Webster was to select swamp lands and furnish descriptions of them to Gray, who had a road contract with the state on which he proposed to reserve and apply such lands; and Webster was to have an interest of one-fourth in the lands so obtained of the state.

The first selection was made in the spring of 1866, and about 2,000 acres entered under it. In the fall of that year nearly the same amount of other lands was selected, but not finally secured.

In July, 1866, Gray signed a paper agreeing to sell…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Diamond Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Crosby v. Estate of StrahanWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Mark Whelan v. New Mexico Western Oil and Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  4. Willard v. ShekellMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Dean v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API