Legal Opinion
United States v. Tristan-Madrigal
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 20, 2010No. 09-1003PublishedCited by 124 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Sergio Tristan-Madrigal appeals the district court’s imposition of a thirty-six month, above-Guidelines sentence as substantively unreasonable. Tristan-Madrigal argues that the district court’s upward variance overemphasized his criminal history and that no information in the record supported a variance of the magnitude that the district court imposed. He additionally contends that the district court provided unreasonable weight to his need for rehabilitation because it believed that Tristan-Madrigal would benefit from custodial drug-abuse…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Irizarry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. Neil E. Campbell Paul Carpenter Rickey D. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Herrera-ZunigaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- United States v. Martin LewisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Joe HeadCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- McCarthy v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Keli DunnicanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Patrick John Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.