People v. Smith
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to recorder’s court of Detroit. (Chambers, J.) Respondent was convicted of receiving stolen property, and sentenced to imprisonment in the State prison for 5 years. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
The respondent was convicted of receiving stolen property, under How. Stat. § 9142. The information charged that the property taken was of the value of one dollar; was the property of one William J. Plackett; and that it had been stolen. The respondent, upon *646arraignment, pleaded not guilty, and proceeded to trial •without any objections to the form of the information. He was sentenced to the State prison for five years.
1. His counsel now insists that the information is defect' ive, in that it does not allege when, where, or by whom the larceny of the property was committed. The objection…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. SchultzMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. HubbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. GoldbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. ColesMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. LorentzenMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. SinclairMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. HoustonUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. PalmMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.