Legal Opinion

Feldman v. American Palestine Line, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 4, 1927No. 223PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Counsel for the appellant has argued that the allowance of these two items was in contravention of sections 823 and 824 of the Revised Statutes (Comp. St. § § 1375,1378). In our view of the case, these statutes relating to taxable costs have no bearing. The sole question is whether a contempt of court was committed. If a contempt was committed, there is no doubt that the court may fine the contemnor and may direct such fine to be paid to the injured party as damages, including as such reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses. In re Tift (D. C.) 11 F. 463; In…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whitney v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Camden v. MayhewSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Christensen Engineering Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
  4. Woodruff v. North Bloomfield Gravel Min. Co.United States Circuit Court · 1886
  5. In re TiftDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. The W. E. Bassett Company v. Revlon, Inc., the W. E. Bassett Company v. Revlon, Inc., (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  2. Cumberland Portland Cement Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1953
  3. Gordon v. SS VEDALINDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
  4. Plimpton v. Mattakeunk Cabin Colony, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1934
  5. Kilsheimer v. Rose & MoskowitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API