Legal Opinion

Denver Suburban Homes & Water Co. v. Fugate

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1917No. 8616PublishedCited by 3 opinions

E'rror to Denver District Court, Hon. Charles G. Butler, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garrigues

Action on promissory note; defense, failure of consideration.

In 1913 the Western Motor Car Company was a corporation doing business in Denver. Defendant in error, Fugate, plaintiff below, and his wife, held all the stock of the motor company except one share which was in the name of one Dr. Lee, merely to qualify him as a director. Fugate was the manager of the company, had entire charge of its affairs, and in fact was simply doing business under the name of a corporation.

Plaintiff in error, The Denver Suburban Homes and Water Company, being engaged in buying, selling and handling real…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shippen v. BowenSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Katz v. HerrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  3. A. G. Danforth & Co. v. CrookshanksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Shedden v. HeardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Mastin v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rudd v. RogersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  2. Comet Industries, Inc. v. Best Plastic Container Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1963
  3. Erickson v. OberlohrColorado Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API