Legal Opinion

Rudd v. Rogerson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 21, 1956No. 17650PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

Plaintiff in error, plaintiff in the trial court and hereinafter called plaintiff or Rudd, seeks review by writ of error of the judgment entered by the district court dismissing his complaint for insufficiency of evidence to support the same. He also seeks review of the judgment entered by the trial court in favor of defendant Rogerson on Rogerson’s counterclaim. Rudd’s action is for rescission of a contract between him and defendant Rogerson by the terms of which plaintiff purchased from defendant a herd of cattle which was represented to be, and sold as, registered Aberdeen Angus.

August 17,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mastin v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  2. Denver Suburban Homes & Water Co. v. FugateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rudd v. RogersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. Dr. John Norton v. Forrest H. LindsayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  3. Acme Equipment Corp. v. Montgomery Co-operative Creamery Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Associates of San Lazaro v. San Lazaro Park PropertiesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  5. Comet Industries, Inc. v. Best Plastic Container Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API