Legal Opinion
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 2, 2017No. 14-16977PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dissent by Judge BEA
*1080OPINION
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”) charges the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) with the obligation to register and reregis-ter pesticide active ingredients and pesticide products.1 In this case, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Pesticide Action Network North America (collectively, “CBD”) allege that the EPA violated the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) when it reregistered certain pesticide active ingredients and pesticide products without undertaking consultation with the National Marine Fisheries…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Russell Johnson, Iii v. Lucent Technologies Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Rattlesnake Coalition v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Forest Guardians v. Mike Johanns, Secretary of Agriculture United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Jones v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. David BernhardtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Ecological Rights Found. v. Fed. Emergency Mgmt. AgencyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Eagle County, Colorado v. STBCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
- Nrdc v. Debra HaalandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.