Legal Opinion
Forest Guardians v. Mike Johanns, Secretary of Agriculture United States Forest Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 13, 2006No. 04-16179PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Forest Guardians appeals the district court’s determination that the United States Forest Service did not violate the Endangered Species Act when it failed to re-initiate consultation on the environmental impact of cattle grazing on a plot of national forest land in Arizona. Forest Guardians urges that the Forest Service was required to re-consult because it failed to comply with the agreed-upon criteria governing the monitoring of the grazing’s impact on endangered and threatened species living in the Water Canyon Allotment of the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Idaho Conservation League v. MummaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. William G. Gordon, and State of Oregon, Defendants-Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Thomas v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Tayler Bayer v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Karuk Tribe v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Yonas Fikre v. FbiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Walker v. WoodfordDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2006
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.