Legal Opinion

Huber v. New York Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 24, 1936No. Civ. S. C. 5PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action upon a policy of life insurance in which plaintiff seeks to recover the total disability benefits provided to be paid by the terms of the policy in question. Defendant insurance company pleaded as affirmative defenses that the policy had lapsed for nonpayment of a premium when due, or within the period of grace; that plaintiff had filed an application for reinstatement of said policy, which application contained false and fraudulent statements with reference to plaintiff’s health and insurability; that in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kansas City Life Ins. Co. v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. MoonMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Marx v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Clark v. DillmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Fisk v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Page v. Washington Mutual Life Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Crump v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Gaunt v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Lincke v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Gleed v. Lincoln National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API