Legal Opinion
United States v. Andriacco
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided October 5, 1996No. CR-3-95-065PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER ON CONTEMPT OF COURT
MERZ, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case is before the Court upon the merits of the oral motion by Attorney Ken Murray, as counsel for Attorney John Poley and Defendant Frank Andriacco, to dissolve the Court’s Order to Show Cause (Doc. # 9) and dismiss the contempt proceedings against Messrs. Poley and Andriacco commenced thereby. The motion is memorialized by Mr. Murray’s letter of October 2, 1996 (in file). 1
On October 26,1995, this Court entered its Judgment and Commitment finding Mr. An-driacco guilty of two counts of failure to make…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Donovan v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Riggs v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Pacifico for Sealing of RecordsOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. Shirley M.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
- United States v. AndriaccoDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999