State v. Brown
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendant contends that since he was arrested in November 1971 and his case was not heard until February 1973, his right to a speedy trial has been impermissibly abridged. We disagree. Like many other constitutional rights, that of a speedy trial is not absolute with the result that not every delay is improper. “The essential ingredient [of justice] is orderly expedition and not mere speed.” Smith v. United States, 360 U.S. 1, 10, 3 L.Ed. 2d 1041, 1048, quoted in United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307, 313, 30 L.Ed. 2d 468, 474. Indeed the very nature of the criminal process…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Beavers v. HaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. TolleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Sweezy v. GarrisonDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1982