Legal Opinion

Hyams v. Old Dominion Co.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 20, 1913No. 1,030PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the District .Court of the United States for the District of Maine; Clarence Hale, Judge. Suit by Godfrey M. Hyams against the Old Dominion Company. From a decree of dismissal (204 Fed. 681), complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

The case is fully stated in the opinion of the learned judge of the District Court passed down May 5, 1913, and needs but slight reference by us to either the facts or the principles involved, as we leave it to turn on one simple rule.

This is a bill in equity, brought by a stockholder in a corporation which for convenience we designate as the “New Jersey corporation,” against a corporation which for convenience we designate as the “Maine corporation.” The bill was brought in the District Court for the District of Maine. The New Jersey corporation was not made a party to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Swan Land & Cattle Co. v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Talbot J. Taylor & Co. v. Southern Pac. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky · 1903

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. General Inv. Co. v. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  2. Turner v. United Mineral Lands Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Veitia v. Fortuna EstatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1917
  4. Hyams v. Old Dominion Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1915
  5. State Ex Rel. Harwood v. SartoriusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API