Legal Opinion

Turner v. United Mineral Lands Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 3, 1941PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The bill in this case is long and complicated. All parties who have submitted briefs describe it as a bill by minority stockholders of the defendant corporations United Mineral Lands Corporation and Premier Paymaster Mines Company to recover for the benefit of these corporations respectively against the individual defendants, who have served as directors of the corporations, for losses suffered by the corporations in consequence of breaches of duty toward the corporations by the defendant directors. We accept this as a sufficient description of the bill for the purposes of this opinion.

Both…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Beyerbach v. Juno Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Downey v. Union Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Andersen v. Albert & J. M. Anderson Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  4. Sprague v. Rust Master Chemical Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Frawley v. ForrestMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API