New Edge Network, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge.
I. Introduction
These petitions arise from the Federal Communications Commission’s (“FCC”) report and order changing its interpretation of a provision of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub.L. 104-104,110 Stat. 56. In 2004, the FCC adopted a new rule replacing its so-called “pick-and-choose” interpretation of 47 U.S.C. § 252(i) with an “all-or-nothing” interpretation. Petitioners in various circuits challenged the new rule, and the Judicial Panel on Multidis-trict Litigation consolidated the petitions in this court. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Puerto Rico Telephone Co. v. T-Mobile Puerto Rico LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- United States v. James D. PaulsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Sung Jang v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.